Data model enhancements from Agile Development 1.0 to Agile Development 2.0
Summarize
Summary of Data Model Enhancements from Agile Development 1.0 to Agile Development 2.0
Agile Development 2.0 introduces significant data model enhancements compared to Agile Development 1.0. Key changes include the deprecation of features from 1.0, such as the Sprint and Release Burndown charts, and the adoption of a more streamlined approach using Assignment Groups for agile teams.
Show less
Key Features
- Common Platform Construct: Agile Development 2.0 standardizes the use of Assignment Groups to map agile teams, eliminating the need for a separate Release Team entity.
- Independent Group Creation: Teams can now be created independently of releases. This allows agile teams to work on multiple releases without the need to recreate the team for each one.
- Sprints Without Releases: Sprints can be created without a mandatory release, providing more flexibility in managing story execution.
- Ongoing Team Backlog: Teams can maintain a continuous backlog independent of releases, allowing for better organization and execution of stories across multiple releases.
- New Association Table: The m2mreleasegrouplist table has been introduced to manage associations between groups and releases, helping to derive release capacity without affecting sprint generation.
Key Outcomes
By transitioning to Agile Development 2.0, customers can expect improved agility and efficiency in managing their agile processes. The ability to create teams and sprints independently of releases enhances flexibility, while the new association table aids in tracking team capacities across various releases, ultimately leading to better resource management and project delivery.
Agile Development 2.0 offers a few data model enhancements over Agile Development 1.0.
Use of the common platform construct — Assignment Group
To map an agile team (scrum team), Agile Development 1.0 uses a separate entity called the Release Team table ( scrum_pp_team). This entity is associated to a release entity as displayed in the following screen shot.
All other tasks on platform such as incidents, problems, changes, projects rely on the assignment group entity to make assignments to a group. Group managers can run reports on an assignment group to gain insight into the work assigned to their groups.
To standardize the use of a group across platform even for scrum work such as stories and tasks, the standard construct Assignment Group is used as opposed to the standalone entity Release Team. Agile Development 2.0 uses assignment groups to map agile teams. An assignment group of type Agile Team is used for defining an agile team.
Agile team (group) need not be created for each release
With Agile Development 1.0, teams are to be created for each release and the teams are to be associated to each release. For example, if a scrum team called Team — Alpha works on multiple quarterly releases. You cannot create the team for one time and associate the team to any release, or release over release. Each time a new release is created, you must create a team with the same name and associate team to the release.
Sprints can be created without a release
Team backlog can be maintained independent of release
Typically, a team can have an ongoing team backlog release after release, it can pull stories from its backlog, and execute them through sprints in the release.
With Agile Development 1.0, a team cannot be defined without defining a release. Hence, team backlog cannot be maintained independent of a release.
With Agile Development 2.0, an assignment group is not created within a release. It can be associated to the release, but not created within a release. Hence, an assignment group can maintain its own backlog.
Association between Release and Group
As there is no direct relation between a release and a group in Agile Development 2.0 (groups are independent and do not have to create groups for each release), the m2m_release_group_list table has been introduced. This table stores the association of a group with a release. This association is not used for sprint generation, but is used to derive the capacity of a release.| Team | Start Sprint | End Sprint | Points (each sprint) | Total Group Capacity For Release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | A_Sprint 1 | A_Sprint 3 | 30 | 90 (3*30) |
| B | B_Sprint 1 | B_Sprint 4 | 40 | 160 (4*40) |