Collaboration in assessments

  • Release version: Australia
  • Updated March 12, 2026
  • 4 minutes to read
  • Summarize
    Summarized using AI
    This content was generated using new OpenAI-powered functionality. Results are provided on an as is basis and are not guaranteed to be accurate or complete.

    Summary of Collaboration in assessments

    Collaboration in the Smart Assessment Engine allows multiple contributors to work together on assessments in real-time, enhancing efficiency and quality. It supports simultaneous editing with instant updates, presence indicators showing active users, and granular delegation for assigning responsibility at the section level. This structure helps manage larger, complex assessments by assigning subject matter experts only to relevant sections while maintaining clear ownership and data integrity.

    Show full answer Show less

    Access Levels and Roles

    • Primary Owner: Has full control to assign or reassign assessments, add or remove contributors, respond to all questions, manage comments and attachments, and submit the assessment.
    • Assessment Contributors: Have read and write access to the entire assessment, can respond to questions, add comments and attachments, and view all participants.
    • Sectional Contributors: Have targeted access to specific sections only, can respond to questions within assigned sections, add comments and attachments, and see all contributors. Sections outside their assignment are read-only with clear lock indicators.

    Question-Level Communication Features

    • Comments: Public comments anchored to specific questions for discussion, visible to anyone with read access (except script-type questions and cancelled assessments).
    • Work Notes: Private, role-restricted internal conversations configured by administrators, visible only to users with assigned roles, used for internal collaboration not visible to external participants.
    • Question Flags: Mark questions needing attention with states Unflagged, Flagged, or Resolved. Flags facilitate reviewer-responder workflows and can be role-restricted by administrators.

    Benefits and Practical Impact

    This collaboration capability enables teams to distribute assessment tasks efficiently and complete them in parallel, reducing turnaround time. Tracking every change ensures accountability and transparency about contributions. Granular delegation helps avoid confusion by clearly defining responsibilities at the section level. Question-level comments, work notes, and flags provide structured feedback mechanisms directly tied to relevant content, improving review quality.

    Ultimately, collaboration transforms assessments from isolated efforts into dynamic, team-driven processes that increase quality, speed, transparency, and confidence in decision-making across teams. Primary owners retain control and visibility while enabling specialized contributors to focus on their areas of expertise.

    Collaboration in Smart Assessment Engine enables you to add multiple contributors to an assessment and support live collaboration with real-time updates. It also displays presence indicators to show who is active on the assessment.

    Exploring Collaboration

    The Collaboration feature in the Smart Assessment Engine aims to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of team-based assessments by enabling multiple users to work together in real-time. It enables assessments to be assigned and reassigned to contributors, with simultaneous editing supported, each user's changes appear instantly to others. Presence indicators also show who are currently active on the assessment.

    To support larger and more complex assessments, collaboration is extended through Granular Delegation, introducing section-level responsibility and access control. Granular delegation enables owners to assign contributors to entire assessments or specific sections, confirming subject matter experts focus only on relevant areas, improving efficiency, and assessment quality overall. Access follows a hierarchical model, when a user is granted access to a section, they automatically inherit access to all subsections within that section. As a result, teams can work together smoothly while maintaining clear ownership, strong data integrity, and visibility into individual responsibilities.

    The Owner has the authority to assign or reassign the assessment and to add or remove contributors. Only the Owner can submit the assessment. Contributors can view the assessments assigned to them and see all participants listed in the side panel, but they cannot reassign or submit the assessment. Contributors can respond to questions and add comments and attachments to the assessment.

    Question-level communication

    Each question card includes a dynamic panel with three question-level communication features:
    Comments
    Comments anchored to a specific question. Reviewers and contributors can ask questions or raise concerns without referencing the assessment-level comment pane. Select the comment icon on a question card to open the conversation in the dynamic panel. Anyone with read access to the assessment can post a comment. When the assessment is in the Cancelled state, existing comments are read-only for all users. Script type questions don't support comments.
    Work notes
    A private, role-restricted conversation thread beside the Comments tab. Work notes are intended for internal conversations between collaborators that should not be visible to all participants. A common example is comments exchanged between reviewers during a Third-Party Risk Management assessment that the vendor responder shouldn't see. Work notes are inactive by default. To make them available, an assessment administrator configures the Work note roles field on the template category with the roles that can view and post work notes. Users without a configured role don't see the Work notes tab.
    Question flags
    A way to mark a question that needs attention. Flags have three states: Unflagged, Flagged, and Resolved. In a typical reviewer-responder loop, a reviewer flags a question to indicate an unsatisfactory response, the responder updates the answer, and the reviewer resolves the flag. Flagging is enabled for all roles by default. To restrict it, an assessment administrator configures the Question flag roles field on the template category with the roles that can change a question's flag state. Users without a configured role can still see the flag state but can't change it.

    For details on configuring the Worknote roles and Question flag roles fields on a template category, see Create an assessment template category. For step-by-step responder workflows, see Add a comment or work note to a question and Flag or resolve a question.

    Access levels and roles

    Collaboration supports three distinct access levels, enabling primary owners to tailor permissions based on each contributor's responsibilities:
    Primary owner
    The primary owner has full control over the assessment. They have the authority to:
    • Assign or reassign the assessment to individuals.
    • Add or remove assessment contributors and sectional contributors.
    • Submit the assessment for review or completion.
    • Respond to all questions across all sections.
    • Manage comments and attachments made by all contributors.
    Assessment contributors
    The assessment contributors have full read and write access to the entire assessment. They can:
    • View the entire assessment, including all sections and questions.
    • Respond to questions in any section.
    • Add comments and attachments at the assessment level.
    • See all contributors involved in the assessment.
    Sectional Contributors
    Sectional Contributors provide targeted, granular access for users who should only work on specific sections of an assessment. They have:
    • View the entire assessment, including all sections and questions.
    • See all contributors involved in the assessment.
    • Respond only to their assigned sections.
    • Add comments and attachments at the assessment level.
    Note:
    Section Contributors see visual indicators (lock icons) on sections where they have read-only access, with clear messaging explaining their access level. This granular delegation enables primary owners to distribute assessment work across subject matter experts while maintaining centralized oversight.

    Benefits of Collaboration

    Collaboration in Smart Assessment Engine enables multiple stakeholders to contribute, review, and refine content in real-time. It introduces flexibility, accountability, and improved quality into the process.
    • Tasks can be distributed and completed in parallel, significantly reducing turnaround time.
    • Every change is tracked, confirming accountability and offering a transparent view of who contributed what and when.
    • Collective expert knowledge results in more thorough and reliable assessments.
    • Large and complex assessments become manageable by dividing work among contributors.
    • Granular delegation supports diverse team structures, from full collaboration to highly targeted, section-specific assignments.
    • Section-level assignments create unambiguous responsibility for specific content areas, reducing confusion and overlap.
    • Primary owners retain full visibility and control while delegating specific work to others.
    • Question flags give reviewers and responders a structured way to raise and resolve concerns on individual questions before the assessment is finalized.
    • Question-level comments and work notes keep feedback anchored to the relevant question. Comments support general discussion; work notes provide private, role-restricted threads not visible to external participants.

    Collaboration transforms assessments from isolated, siloed activities into dynamic, team-driven processes. By enabling structured collaboration, organizations can not only increase the quality and speed of assessments but also foster greater alignment, transparency, and decision-making confidence across teams.