Automating prioritization and triaging Freigeben Version: Australia Aktualisiert 12. März 2026 1 Minute LesedauerAutomate prioritization and triaging of findings using rules and severity mapping. Associating finding with a configuration item using lookup rulesUnified Security Exposure Management uses lookup rules to associate imported third-party exposure findings with configuration items (CIs) in the Configuration Management Database (CMDB). These rules match asset data to existing CIs, enabling accurate remediation.Categorizing findings and discovered items using classification rulesClassification groups automate the classification of entities or records based on the classification rules defined in the group. The condition for each rule is evaluated in order, and the first matching rule is used.Prioritizing vulnerabilities and other findings using roll-up calculatorsAfter assessing risk calculators, use the roll-up calculators to configure how the cumulative risk scores are computed for remediation tasks and other higher entities.Assigning findings to remediation teams using assignment rulesAssignment rules automatically assign findings, such as vulnerable items, application vulnerabilities, container vulnerabilities, and configuration test results, to the appropriate groups for remediation. This streamlined triage ensures that tasks are directed to the appropriate teams, and enhances consistency and visibility across security and compliance programs.Defining your own service level agreements (SLAs) using remediation target rulesRemediation target rules set the expected time frame for addressing findings, similar to how service level agreements (SLAs) set deadlines for fixing vulnerabilities. You can also send notifications to users and groups when target dates are approaching and when they are past due.Deferring findings automatically without manual intervention using exception rulesException rules for Security Exposure Management Workspace enable you to automate the deferral process for findings. Request an exception for the findings that can't be remediated or deferred immediately, by identifying the impacted vulnerabilities, configuration items (CIs), or VIs. Defer the matching findings based on the rule when the system identifies them by automating the finding deferral process.Grouping multiple findings as remediation tasks for easy processing using remediation task rulesRemediation tasks help vulnerability analysts and remediation teams manage findings in bulk. By configuring remediation task rules, you can automatically group findings into remediation tasks, eliminating the need for manual task creation and streamlining remediation efforts.Closing stale detections and findings automatically using auto-close rulesAuto-close rules automatically close stale detections and findings based on predefined criteria. These rules ensure that redundant or unwanted findings are marked as closed, helping to maintain an accurate and up-to-date record of the organization's security posture. By automating this process, the rules reduce manual effort and enable teams to focus on active and critical vulnerabilities.Deleting stale findings automatically using auto-delete rulesAuto-delete rules automatically remove findings from the system based on predefined criteria. These rules help manage the life-cycle of vulnerabilities by ensuring that resolved or outdated findings are removed, reducing clutter and maintaining a clean, up-to-date database. This automation streamlines the vulnerability management process and ensures that teams focus on current and relevant issues.Controlling the ingestion volume with automatic exclusionExclusion rules provide a way to filter or exclude detections from getting converted into VITs during the ingestion process in Vulnerability Response.Severity mapping for Unified Security Exposure ManagementSeverity mapping is a critical feature that enables organizations to standardize and normalize the severity levels of findings detected across different sources. This process involves mapping the severity levels from various scanners and sources to a common severity scale used within Unified Security Exposure Management.
Automating prioritization and triaging Freigeben Version: Australia Aktualisiert 12. März 2026 1 Minute LesedauerAutomate prioritization and triaging of findings using rules and severity mapping. Associating finding with a configuration item using lookup rulesUnified Security Exposure Management uses lookup rules to associate imported third-party exposure findings with configuration items (CIs) in the Configuration Management Database (CMDB). These rules match asset data to existing CIs, enabling accurate remediation.Categorizing findings and discovered items using classification rulesClassification groups automate the classification of entities or records based on the classification rules defined in the group. The condition for each rule is evaluated in order, and the first matching rule is used.Prioritizing vulnerabilities and other findings using roll-up calculatorsAfter assessing risk calculators, use the roll-up calculators to configure how the cumulative risk scores are computed for remediation tasks and other higher entities.Assigning findings to remediation teams using assignment rulesAssignment rules automatically assign findings, such as vulnerable items, application vulnerabilities, container vulnerabilities, and configuration test results, to the appropriate groups for remediation. This streamlined triage ensures that tasks are directed to the appropriate teams, and enhances consistency and visibility across security and compliance programs.Defining your own service level agreements (SLAs) using remediation target rulesRemediation target rules set the expected time frame for addressing findings, similar to how service level agreements (SLAs) set deadlines for fixing vulnerabilities. You can also send notifications to users and groups when target dates are approaching and when they are past due.Deferring findings automatically without manual intervention using exception rulesException rules for Security Exposure Management Workspace enable you to automate the deferral process for findings. Request an exception for the findings that can't be remediated or deferred immediately, by identifying the impacted vulnerabilities, configuration items (CIs), or VIs. Defer the matching findings based on the rule when the system identifies them by automating the finding deferral process.Grouping multiple findings as remediation tasks for easy processing using remediation task rulesRemediation tasks help vulnerability analysts and remediation teams manage findings in bulk. By configuring remediation task rules, you can automatically group findings into remediation tasks, eliminating the need for manual task creation and streamlining remediation efforts.Closing stale detections and findings automatically using auto-close rulesAuto-close rules automatically close stale detections and findings based on predefined criteria. These rules ensure that redundant or unwanted findings are marked as closed, helping to maintain an accurate and up-to-date record of the organization's security posture. By automating this process, the rules reduce manual effort and enable teams to focus on active and critical vulnerabilities.Deleting stale findings automatically using auto-delete rulesAuto-delete rules automatically remove findings from the system based on predefined criteria. These rules help manage the life-cycle of vulnerabilities by ensuring that resolved or outdated findings are removed, reducing clutter and maintaining a clean, up-to-date database. This automation streamlines the vulnerability management process and ensures that teams focus on current and relevant issues.Controlling the ingestion volume with automatic exclusionExclusion rules provide a way to filter or exclude detections from getting converted into VITs during the ingestion process in Vulnerability Response.Severity mapping for Unified Security Exposure ManagementSeverity mapping is a critical feature that enables organizations to standardize and normalize the severity levels of findings detected across different sources. This process involves mapping the severity levels from various scanners and sources to a common severity scale used within Unified Security Exposure Management.